More Than a Fetish: The Psychology of Breasts for Real People
Bratags’ Shizuka’ s Perspective on Dr. Mark Griffiths’ “Bosom buddies: A brief look at breast fetishism”
Most conversations about breasts in mainstream psychology get flattened into one word: fetish. A label. A category. A checkbox. But here at Bratags — and especially through the lived voices of collectors, lovers, wearers, admirers, models, and cup-story humans — we’ve learned something deeper: breasts are part identity, part intimacy, part communication, and part joy.
That’s why Dr. Mark Griffiths’ 2015 article, “Bosom buddies: A brief look at breast fetishism,” stood out to me. His work steps into the space between academia and lived human experience, trying to understand why breasts hold cultural and erotic power at all. It’s not gossip, not porn analysis, not shallow description — it’s real science attempting to map something we experience every day.
And that attempt alone deserves credit. So let’s talk about what he uncovered… and what the Bratags community already knows.
Breasts as Psychology, Not Just Fetish
In the referenced article, Dr. Griffiths explains that what many call breast fetishism is more complex than the word suggests. Psychologically speaking, calling something a “fetish” tends to mean it is necessary for arousal. But Griffiths notes that this isn’t usually the case with breasts — they are erotic, powerful, and intimate to many, but not required for sexual functioning.
It’s a reminder that attraction to breasts isn’t inherently a disorder; it’s a spectrum of desire shaped by evolution, culture, and individual meaning.
Here at Bratags, we see the same truth every day:
Some people admire size.
Some admire shape.
Some admire texture, gravity, softness, presence.
Some admire how breasts look in lingerie, in a T-shirt, or beneath nothing at all.
That isn’t pathology — it’s personality.

Humans Are Wired to Notice Breasts — Literally
One section of Griffiths’ article digs into why humans respond so intensely to breasts, especially compared to other species. He discusses theories around evolution:
- 🧠 Oxytocin bonding — the chemical hug that makes closeness feel electric
- 💞 Pair-bond reinforcement — how breasts help us connect and stay connected
- 👁️ Emotional loop — touch, gaze, and presence intertwining desire and comfort
Breasts become communication tools — for connection, nurturance, and erotic exchange.
It’s fascinating to see academia confirm what lingerie culture has whispered forever:
breasts aren’t just sexy; they are emotional language.
If you’ve spent time on Bratags, or on my Shizuka page — looking at the little stories behind each photograph — you already know how breasts communicate mood, character, vulnerability, control, and love.
Science names it.
We feel it.

Beyond Vanilla: Griffiths Acknowledges the Spectrum
One of the strongest contributions in the article is how Griffiths points to the range of breast-involved desire:
breast focus,
breast worship,
breast enlargement fantasy,
breast dominance play,
and countless unique preferences.
He shows that fetishism isn’t a singular behavior — it’s a mosaic.
And honestly, Bratags might be the living museum of that mosaic.
If you scroll through the community, you see not just size differences…
but emotional differences:
tenderness, power, humor, identity, nostalgia, ownership, freedom.
That’s why Bratags exists — to honor the diversity of this fascination.
Research Meets Reality
Griffiths also references data: surveys showing how nipple and breast stimulation boosts arousal for a large percentage of both men and women.
That scientific detail matters because it reframes breasts not only as visual objects, but as sexual organs with neurological purpose, affecting brain chemistry and erotic feedback loops.
It confirms the lived stories shared here:
for many people, breasts aren’t just background scenery —
they are active participants in pleasure.
Why This Matters to Bratags
Bratags isn’t a site about fetish labels — it’s a site about appreciation, respect, collection, identity, and celebration.
The original article gives language we can build on:
- breasts are psychologically significant,
- socially meaningful,
- erotically influential,
- and personally defining.
And Griffiths’ conclusion leaves room for emotion, not just classification.
That’s a scientific stance we can respect.

Community Conversation
So now let’s bring this to you:
If breasts are more than a fetish, then what are they to you?
Are they:
💬 bonding symbols?
💬 aesthetic beauty?
💬 emotional comfort?
💬 erotic architecture?
💬 empowerment?
💬 something spiritual?
Comment and share. This is what Bratags does best —
turning private fascination into a shared human archive.
Credits & Source
This post responds to and reflects on:
Dr. Mark Griffiths — “Bosom buddies: A brief look at breast fetishism” (2015)
Original article link:
https://drmarkgriffiths.wordpress.com/2015/01/19/bosom-buddies-a-brief-look-at-breast-fetishism/
- List your bras Signup Now
- Join our mailing list
- Pitch us your data questions or ideas [email protected]